Austria could become the next country that feels compelled to veto a euro rescue plan to placate domestic voters - argues think-tank
In August 2010, a newly elected Slovak government refused to contribute to the first Greek bail-out. A year later, the rising popularity of the anti-euro True Finns pushed the Finnish government to demand that Greece should put up collateral in return for new loans. Which eurozone country will be next in line to hold up a bail-out package or veto new rules? Austria could be a good candidate. Each time a smallish European Union country balks at euro rescue efforts, analysts and policy-makers scramble to figure out its political dynamics and wonder why they had missed the brewing storm. With populism on the rise in much of Europe and big countries dominating eurozone decision-making, it is only a matter of time before the next member-state throws a spanner in the works.
The EU's traditional mode of decision-making is too cumbersome to fight the euro crisis. Instead, Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Nicolas Sarkozy have regularly pre-cooked plans before euro summits. Small and discreet bodies such as the Frankfurt Group - Germany, France, the European Central Bank, two other EU representatives and the International Monetary Fund - have taken centre stage. The EU's Brussels-based institutions have often been sidelined. So have smaller EU countries. Resentment about not having a voice has helped to lift nationalist and anti-euro forces in such countries. Their interventions are making EU policy-making a lot less predictable. Austria could be the next place where the rise of anti-euro populists turns into a problem for the EU as a whole. The anti-immigrant and anti-euro Freedom Party – or FPÖ - is polling neck and neck with the established parties, the conservative People's Party – or ÖVP - and the Social Democrats – or SPÖ - which currently govern the country in a grand coalition. A national election is not due until 2013. But in Austria's scandal-ridden politics, an early election cannot be ruled out altogether. Some say that the current impasse over a planned national debt brake and austerity measures could spell the end of the ÖVP-SPÖ coalition.
During the days of the late party leader Jörg Haider, the FPÖ joined a coalition government with the ÖVP; prompting the EU to impose sanctions in protest. Wolfgang Schüssel, Austria's wily chancellor (prime minister) at the time, managed to neutralise the FPÖ in government. The party duly split in 2005 and for a while fell back to single digit support levels. Now it could be heading back towards 30 per cent. It is too early to predict the next election outcome. But tired of their deadlocked, squabbling grand coalition - Austrians seem to dread the spectre of an even bigger coalition of ÖVP, SPÖ and Greens - to keep the FPÖ out of power - just as much as a renewed ÖVP-FPÖ tie-up. Few Austrians think that the current ÖVP leader and foreign minister Michael Spindelegger could control the FPÖ's firebrand leader Heinz-Christian Strache. Strache already boasts that he will be the next chancellor. Strache's personal approval ratings are awful, he lacks a comprehensive programme, and his party is as prone to scandals as its peers. But Strache's promises to stop sending Austrian money to Brussels, hold referendums on existing euro rescue packages and start a debate about Austria leaving the euro resonates with the many EU-sceptic Austrians.
The Austrians' ambivalence towards the EU has long been a puzzle. As a small, open and centrally located country that lives on exports and tourism - Austria has benefited a lot from the EU single market and the euro. Yet Austria has punched below its weight in Europe, its EU policies have been rather parochial with few initiatives beyond the Balkans. And it has not produced as many great European figures as, for example, Sweden or Finland. In surveys, the Austrians have consistently been among the most sceptical about the EU. In the latest Eurobarometer poll, published in December 2011, 42 per cent of Austrians said they had a bad image of the EU. In neighbouring Germany, France and Italy, those shares are much lower at 20-25 per cent. However, Austria's Euroscepticism looks shallow. When asked more specifically whether they trust EU institutions and want the EU to get more involved in, say, protecting the environment or fighting terrorism - the Austrians show themselves as solid though not enthusiastic pro-Europeans.
While the Austrians are much less keen on more EU co-operation to save the euro than the Dutch or Finns, over half of Austrians say they would welcome Eurobonds. If the public mood on Europe appears confused, the government's EU policies are even more so. In a baffling U-turn on the big parties' traditional pro-EU stance, Faymann and Spindelegger in 2008 promised to hold referendums on future treaty changes. But after agreeing to the new eurozone-plus treaty or fiscal pact, in December, Faymann wiggled out of his referendum promise causing glee in an FPÖ that has long demanded more direct democracy.
Having been as implacably opposed to Eurobonds as Germany, the government changed its mind once Austria's own bond spreads started rising last autumn. Shortly afterwards, Faymann departed from Austria's monetary orthodoxy when he suddenly called for the European Central Bank to play the "leading role" in saving the euro by financing the European Financial Stability Facility and the European Stability Mechanism. Meanwhile, Spindelegger came out in support of a smaller European Commission – although Austria has always been a staunch defender of the principle that each country must have its own commissioner in Brussels. Asked to evaluate Austria's EU policies in a recent interview, the Czech foreign minister, Karel Schwarzenberg, quipped that "I cannot comment on something that does not exist". That verdict may be unkind. But the impression persists that the current muddle results from the coalition's desperate attempt to catch the Eurosceptic mood and thus stop the FPÖ's rise.
In her euro policies, Merkel is trying to keep the 'smalls' on board. She makes a point of phoning leaders from smaller eurozone countries to discuss - some say inform them about - plans for the next summit. She met Faymann ahead of the December euro summit. She and Sarkozy need to do more to quell the impression that today's EU is run by a directorate of big countries; or worse, by a Berlin dictate. But the smaller countries also need to take advantage of such opportunities by presenting constructive proposals.
For some, it appears easier to moan about being steamrolled by the Franco-German juggernaut than to stand up for their own ideas and interests. Austria – with its enviable growth and unemployment rates - roughly 3 per cent and 4 per cent respectively, in 2011, on EU data – would be well suited to act as a spokesman for eurozone's smaller creditor countries. It could be pro-active in safeguarding the authority of the commission, without which the EU cannot function well. It could use its close ties to neighbouring Germany to remind Berlin that growth-promoting strategies are needed to deal with the debt crisis. Instead, the coalition government's lack of an EU strategy is playing into the hands of the Freedom Party: at least Strache's anti-euro message is loud and clear. Unless the two main parties come up with an attractive alternative, Austria could become the next euro country that feels compelled to veto a euro rescue plan to placate domestic voters.Katinka Barysch is deputy director of the Centre for European Reform think-tank, in the United Kingdom