Reviewing the UK-EU relationship - the minister's view
by David Lidington
12 July 2012
Significant reform and change is compatible with the British government's belief that membership of the EU is in the national interest – writes Europe Minister
As the Foreign Secretary William Hague has said, now is the right time to take a critical and constructive look at how the European Union's competences are used and what that means for our national interest in the United Kingdom. That is why, this week, we have launched a review into the balance of these competences and how they affect the way we work here.
A desire to see significant reform and change is perfectly compatible with our belief that membership of the EU is in our national interest. We will continue to play a key role in a strong and stable EU. Being part of the union is central to how we in Britain create jobs, expand trade and protect our interests around the world. It allows us to be in a single market of some 500 million people, with a combined gross domestic product of £11trillion - in which we can trade, travel and work freely.
The UK has always had good track record in providing leadership and a constructive agenda for change. The country has been one of the leading proponents of the single market and we have vigorously championed enlargement. We led the debate on reducing the burden of European regulation and we have consistently pressed other member states for a sharper focus on extending the single market to the services, digital and energy sectors.
However, recent events have shown, more than ever, that the EU can seem remote from ordinary people. Across Europe, the positive image of the union has dropped from 52 per cent in 2007 - to 31 per cent in 2011. It is also clear that, without significant change, the EU will not meet the challenge of competing in an increasingly dynamic world economy. For example, setting up a company costs several times more in the EU than it does in the United States or India.
As the eurozone takes steps towards closer fiscal and economic integration, and as the EU continues to develop, we need to be absolutely clear when it is most appropriate to take decisions at the national or local level - closer to the people affected, and in other cases when it is best to take action at the EU or global level. And we need to be comfortable about the union moving towards greater 'variable geometry', with member states in a number of different configurations cooperating in different policy areas. This will make the EU more effective, with the flexibility of a network, not the rigidity of a single bloc.
This is why the review will look at the case for rebalancing responsibilities. It will be as thorough and detailed analysis as is possible on what the exercise of the EU's powers does and what it means for the UK. We will ensure that our national debate is grounded in knowledge of the facts and will be a vital aid for policy making in government.
This extensive review has never been attempted before. It is good for the EU that its members debate honestly and openly how it functions and responds to the challenges it faces. We know there are a lot of people out there with knowledge and expertise on how the union affects Britain. We will want to hear from them and the Foreign Office & Commonwealth Office website will include updates on what areas of competence the review is working on.
David Lidington is the Minister for Europe, in the United Kingdom
As the Foreign Secretary William Hague has said, now is the right time to take a critical and constructive look at how the European Union's competences are used and what that means for our national interest in the United Kingdom. That is why, this week, we have launched a review into the balance of these competences and how they affect the way we work here.
A desire to see significant reform and change is perfectly compatible with our belief that membership of the EU is in our national interest. We will continue to play a key role in a strong and stable EU. Being part of the union is central to how we in Britain create jobs, expand trade and protect our interests around the world. It allows us to be in a single market of some 500 million people, with a combined gross domestic product of £11trillion - in which we can trade, travel and work freely.
The UK has always had good track record in providing leadership and a constructive agenda for change. The country has been one of the leading proponents of the single market and we have vigorously championed enlargement. We led the debate on reducing the burden of European regulation and we have consistently pressed other member states for a sharper focus on extending the single market to the services, digital and energy sectors.
However, recent events have shown, more than ever, that the EU can seem remote from ordinary people. Across Europe, the positive image of the union has dropped from 52 per cent in 2007 - to 31 per cent in 2011. It is also clear that, without significant change, the EU will not meet the challenge of competing in an increasingly dynamic world economy. For example, setting up a company costs several times more in the EU than it does in the United States or India.
As the eurozone takes steps towards closer fiscal and economic integration, and as the EU continues to develop, we need to be absolutely clear when it is most appropriate to take decisions at the national or local level - closer to the people affected, and in other cases when it is best to take action at the EU or global level. And we need to be comfortable about the union moving towards greater 'variable geometry', with member states in a number of different configurations cooperating in different policy areas. This will make the EU more effective, with the flexibility of a network, not the rigidity of a single bloc.
This is why the review will look at the case for rebalancing responsibilities. It will be as thorough and detailed analysis as is possible on what the exercise of the EU's powers does and what it means for the UK. We will ensure that our national debate is grounded in knowledge of the facts and will be a vital aid for policy making in government.
This extensive review has never been attempted before. It is good for the EU that its members debate honestly and openly how it functions and responds to the challenges it faces. We know there are a lot of people out there with knowledge and expertise on how the union affects Britain. We will want to hear from them and the Foreign Office & Commonwealth Office website will include updates on what areas of competence the review is working on.
David Lidington is the Minister for Europe, in the United Kingdom
RELATED CONTENT
MEPs want 'United States of Europe' - even without the UK
More than 50 per cent of MEPs want a 'United States of Europe', while 20 per cent think that the EU would be 'better off' if the United Kingdom left the union – according to new poll
More than 50 per cent of MEPs want a 'United States of Europe', while 20 per cent think that the EU would be 'better off' if the United Kingdom left the union – according to new poll
COMMENTS
