Public Service Europe - European politics
peak oil graph

Past peak oil - life after cheap fossil fuels


by Bulent Gokay
04 August 2011
  • Email
  • Print
  • Post to Facebook
  • Digg
  • Share to LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Delicious
The only rational response to the end of the cheap oil is to redesign all aspects of our lives

Perhaps the greatest vulnerability of the current world system is that of availability and distribution of critical resources as oil, food, and water. The very logic of accumulation under the current economic system necessitates that the material elements – resources - of nature are transformed into commodities in an ever-expanding rate. In this long history of human excessiveness in production and consumption, the stability of the economic order as an unrestrained structure is dependent - more than ever - on the continued accumulation in a cycle of never-ending expansion. This means that more and more materials from the nature must be consumed in the process of production. So far, the world's most valuable energy supplies and minerals are being extracted and consumed at a breakneck pace.

Oil is the most strategic raw material. It can hardly be overstated how crucial petroleum is to our modern industrial society. Oil fuels the economy. It is the largest single traded product in the world. It provides about 95 per cent of all transportation fuels and 40 per cent of global energy. Oil is also determinant of national security. Today's modern armies are entirely dependent on oil-powered ships, planes, helicopters and armoured vehicles. Oil also supplies feedstock for thousands of manufactured products and is vital for food manufacturing. Some 17 per cent of our energy is used for producing food. Modern agriculture makes heavy use of oil in a variety of ways. We use oil for fertilisers, pesticides, and for the packaging and distribution of food.

Since the beginning of the 20th century, global trade and a global economy have developed, and our population has grown in size from one billion to six billion, by drawing down a massive natural gift of energy in the form of cheap crude oil. Up until early modern times - miners, scientists, natural philosophers and other experts believed that gold, silver and other minerals were vegetable-like in that, when mined, they would literally grow back like mown grass. This belief was not wrong, in principle, in the case of coal and its hydrocarbon cousins in gaseous and liquid form - because they are the remains of ancient organisms. As a practical maxim, though, it was completely mistaken - because the time it would take normal geological processes to transform organic matter into coal, natural gas and petroleum is in the order of millions of years. Therefore, for all practical purposes, these fuels are finite, non-renewable energy sources. In any given region, there is a fixed amount of oil at the beginning of the exploration and after every drop of oil is taken out - there will be that amount less of oil left under the ground.

Like any fixed non-renewable resource, oil is limited. And its consumption will rise, peak - the point beyond which oil production will irreversibly start declining - and decline. Production follows a bell curve and after production reaches peak oil - meaning when half the oil is taken out - production will inevitably fall. On the upslope of the curve, there is the first oil – that closest to the surface - which is also called "cheap oil" or "easy oil". It is easier and cheaper to take that oil out and also it is better quality – being "light" low-sulphur oil which is, therefore, cheaper to refine. On the upslope of the curve, oil production costs are lower than on the down slope, when extra effort and cost is needed to extract the remaining poorer quality resource from deeper in the reservoirs. And extra cost is required to refine this "heavy oil" - which is high-sulphur, very viscous and does not flow easily. Therefore, once oil production reaches its peak, global demand is most likely to exceed the capacity to produce it and prices will rise - while oil-dependent economies will face serious problems. An increasing body of evidence suggests that the era of "easy oil" is over and that we have entered a new period of "tough oil".

Today, oil and gas experts around the world are growingly alarmed at current and future scarcity of the "black gold". As demand for energy explodes worldwide, there is less of it available and, it seems, less exploration for it. Crude oil prices have doubled since 2001. There may still be times when oil prices temporarily fall due to sharp decline in demand, mainly during the times of serious economic crisis like the current austerity period in the western economies - but the general long-term trend is unquestionably upward in the price of crude oil. United States refineries are working close to capacity, yet no new refinery has been constructed since 1976. And oil tankers are fully booked, but outdated ships are being decommissioned faster than new ones are being built.

According to many estimates, the world is depleting oil reserves at an annual rate of 6 per cent. At the same time, growth in demand is rising at an annual rate of 2.2 per cent. All this means that the world's oil industry would have to find the equivalent of more than 8 per cent a year in newly discovered oil reserves to maintain an orderly oil market. Unfortunately, discoveries are lagging behind, primarily because new large oil deposits are not being found - but also because, even if they were, there is a considerable time lag between a discovery and turning the oil into a useable energy product. Many observers have drawn attention to the extraordinary technological accomplishments of the industry over the past few decades. Of course, advanced technologies will buy a bit more time before production commences to fall, but it is also important to appreciate that spending more money on oil exploration will not really change this situation. There is only so much crude oil in the world and the industry has found about 90 per cent of it.

There are some indications that, in the years to come, the search for new sources of oil maybe transformed into a quest for entirely new sources of energy. The replacement of fossil fuels by alternatives such as solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, hydrogen and nuclear fission does not yet seem to be a viable alternative. So far, the available energy alternatives - mostly solar and wind power - offer only diluted energy substitutes. They are not as powerful a fuel source as oil. For solar and wind energy to come close to providing the same amount of energy as oil does, would require a truly massive scale up in production and deployment of such technologies. And still they would come nowhere near to matching the convenience and density of oil. Therefore, while conservation and renewable energy are much in the news, the reality is that neither of these factors is likely to have any significant impact on the steadily growing demand for oil products.

Many analysts, looking at the current discovery and production levels of oil fields around the world suggest that within the next decade - the supply of conventional oil will be unable to keep up with demand. We are also witnessing the impact in the increasing scarcity and cost of food and other critical resources that rely on oil. There are some reports that there has been a surge of motorists running out of fuel because they could not afford to fill their tanks. Airlines are cutting back on flights and some even are beginning to charge extra for checked baggage. During the last couple of years, in some parts of the world, rising fuel prices led to massive protests and strikes. Many leading economists and oil experts claim that the price of oil generally reflects the fast rising demand from China and India, and stagnant production as reserves of accessible oil become less plentiful. According to some experts, even a shortfall between demand and supply as little as 10 or 15 percent is enough to wholly shatter an oil-dependent economy. There were serious oil-related crises in the 1970s, but these "shocks" were due to political effects rather than the decreasing amount of oil. Unlike the oil shocks of the 1970s, this time there seems to be a permanent decline. It is becoming clear that cheap fuel is no longer something that we can take for granted. The economy is already suffering for it. And the end of cheap oil indicates a potentially spectacular reshaping of the globalised trade flows that have emerged in the last two decades.

Without volume energy - we have no sustainable water, we have no sustainable food, and we now have no sustainable healthcare. And since five-sixths of the world still barely uses any energy it really is an important issue. And since five-sixths of the world is still growing fast or too fast it is an even more important issue. What peaking does mean, in energy terms, is that once oil has peaked, further growth in supply, is over. Peaking is generally, also, a relatively quick transition to a relatively serious decline at least on a basin-by-basin basis. And the issue, then, is the world's biggest serious question. The world economy was able to enjoy impressive growth in the 20th century, largely because it benefited from cheap and abundant oil, and could afford ignoring environmental costs. The severe effects of global environmental damage have now risen to the point that the very survival of the humanity is at stake. By far the most controversial feature of environmental damage relates to potential atmospheric damage, that is, damage to the gaseous membrane that maintains all life on earth. Especially, the combustion products of fossil fuels are the major source of danger to earth's atmosphere. The problems arise because some of the key gaseous components of the atmosphere are becoming excessively concentrated and many experts believe that this situation is dangerously upsetting the delicate balance between various gaseous in earth's atmosphere.

This human-induced global warming is only one among many serious environmental consequences caused by the never-ending drive of accumulation under the existing system. This is the secret ticking time bomb under the global economic system in the 21st century. The only long-term solution is to reduce significantly our energy usage. This does not just mean using energy efficient light bulbs, taking the bus to work or cycling. In order to reduce our energy consumption, it follows that we consume less products. The only rational response to the impending end of the cheap oil age is to redesign all aspects of our lives.

Bulent Gokay is professor of international relations at Keele University, in the UK
COMMENTS



(EMAILS WILL NOT BE SHOWN)


  

YOUR COMMENT WILL BE APPROVED BY A MODERATOR
EMAILS WILL NOT BE SHOWN.

Excellent summary of where "humanity " is at; if only it could lead to serious action from those in power.
Anonymous

Good summary about one of the most important issue of the 21th century - unfortunately still missing in the polical agendas. Changes are pushed at the margin - renewable energies development, energy efficiency - but the efforts are ridiculous in comparison with the challenge that the world economy is facing. The transition is likely to be tough while the conversion of our economy could have been smoother if we had been far-sighted.
Soisic - UK

Bulent Gokay has provided an excellent summary of the situation but ends the article at the point at which a more useful piece might begin - "it follows that we consume less products. The only rational response to the impending end of the cheap oil age is to redesign all aspects of our lives."
Easy to say but the more immediate problem is that it is only by economic growth across every sector and world wide do we have any chance of handling the debt problems we currently face.
Is it not reasonable therefore to "reset" the entire world economy along more more sustainable lines? No winners, no losers.
Larry Langman - Australia

I agree wholeheartedly but I think it's going to be a lot more radical than that. The whole society dynamic will revert back to pre-industrial age - small cities and villages with small electricity usage for essentials like medicine, research etc. The global economy will contract to next to nothing and countries will become once again self-sustaining. The way it's meant to be. Of course the point we all seem to overlook so we can sleep at night is that surviving the transition is going to be horrific, especially if governments like ours sit back and do nothing which is the current modus operandi. Go to your local gardware store and try to buy tools that don't require electricity e.g. a bit and brace or small hand drill. We need to change our way of thinking fast. The world population must contract back to pre-oil, pre-coal times i.e. around a billion. Currently we are at 6 billion. I have gone through various emotional stages over this topic ranging from terror to depression. I'm now quite happy. Lets face it what else is going to sort out these puppet governments who dance to the tune of the carpetbaggers. Bring it on. If my family and I survive, good. If not, Ces't la vie. I just want to know that we died without completely destroying the planet.
William - Australia

We won't destroy the planet, but we may destroy the current life systems on it. The planet will recover when we are gone with a new life system.
We must rebuild the banking system into one that can survive without growth. This will mean no more interest payments to or by banks or other financial institutions.
The system is about to break at the moment so if governments wish to stay in charge perhaps they ought to have a plan B in existence, for when the inevitable happens. If there is no plan B, chaos will reign when the financial meltdown occurs.
Ken Neal - Newbury, UK

Yep, university profs haven't changed much - they think the world would be a better place if everybody spent their time cycling around campus and indoctrinating students into socialism. Meanwhile in the real world, we have seen a fantastic increase in standards of living around the globe due to fossil fuels. The exact same arguments for peak oil could have been - and were - made 100 years ago. We could have all gone into self-righteous, self-depravation then and missed 100 years of progress.
There are centuries of fossil fuels left, but every time there is a price spike, there will always be a few opportunists making a fast buck on snake oil "alternatives" or power hungry politicians trying to repress economic freedom. Don't fall for it.
Threepwood - Michigan

Threepwood - I have been alive long enough and witnessed the change's that have taken place to say you are wrong. Consider yourself lucky you have experienced this progress, but you must live in isolation not to realise its falling apart.
I came of age in the 1950s, where anything was possible and am well aware of the technological advancements that have been made - which we enjoy.
I also realise there has been a decline in many areas including the most important one (energy), discussed in this article. How anyone can make the unsubstantiated statements you have and expect people to believe it is beyond comprehension.
There is a worldwide consensus by people more qualified than you or I, that we have reached a critical time in mans evolution to address these problems. Only the uneducated or stupid are oblivious to these facts and unaware of their own history on the planet. This article is spot on.
Insight - Oboro USA

Insight, yes, I remember that 'qualified worldwide consensus' in the early seventies, when I was shown the same exact charts and told by the same politically aligned academics that I would be using public transport or driving a golf cart because all the oil would be gone.
Meanwhile in off-campus reality, we saw an unprecedented global glut of the stuff, sending prices plummeting to near $10 a barrel by the 90s. Hmmm. How did they get it so wrong?
In reality, tight supply and price spikes are not caused by lack of physical resources, but political interference, self imposed ideological restrictions, massive taxes here, massive subsidies there, state run oil, cabals etc.
Look past the Malthusian hype and there is plentiful supply. I agree that political interference, and hence future supply/price is difficult to predict, but this is a constant for any source of energy, not just oil?
Threepwood - Michigan

Threepwood - If by driving a golf cart, you mean a small fuel efficient car, the last time I looked that seems to be what is happening. There have been many events affecting the price of oil at any given time.
Your plentiful supply comment is a generalisation, it's much more complicated than that. There is oil out there, but is it easily extracted or do we want to pay the price for this either monetarily or environmentally?
Are you taking into account increasing world-wide demand? China is now producing more cars than America. Oil discoveries have been less than annual production since 1980.
According to several sources, production is past or near its maximum. The world population has grown faster than oil production. Because of this, oil production per capita peaked in 1979 (preceded by a plateau during the period of 1973-1979).
According to a study of the largest 811 oil fields, conducted in early 2008 by Cambridge Energy Research Associates, the average rate of field decline was 4.5 per cent per year. The IEA stated, in November 2008, that an analysis of 800 oil fields showed the decline in oil production to be 6.7 per cent a year, and that this will grow to 8.6 per cent in 2030.
Of course, any new fields would delay this decline but demand is also increasing. I do look past the hype and rely on industry reports for information as well as my own observations when working here and abroad.
It would seem an intelligent move to look to a future possibility without cheap oil and prepare for it, even the military are doing this.
insight - Oboro, USA

Declining production data from the IEA World Energy Outlook 2010's expected crude oil production from "existing fields" plus part of the IEA's "fields yet to be developed" and "fields yet to be found". Quite generous, really.
And consumption data from the CIA World Fact Book.The net-exporter's consumption is incremented by a modest 2.9 per cent per year from 2010 levels.The premise is that net exporting nations will continue to favour supplying their internal consumption over exporting their oil during the next 20 years.
These nations will, therefore, become prime locations for global manufacturing as oil supplies to the net importing nations become more tenuous. At the same time their production capacity will be affected generally in the same way as the rest of the world, as depicted by the IEA's WEO2010.
The suggested rate of increase in consumption within exporting nations of only 2.9 per cent per year is likely to be very "conservative", but things get quite bad enough fast enough with that rate; people can make their own assessment of the more likely rate and the subsequent implications. Saudi Arabia's internal consumption is rising at about 5.5 per cent per year, for example.
The largest oil importers - say the top ten importers including USA, China, Japan, Germany, South Korea and India - will make have made agreements with other exporters to assure supply of their import requirements over the same period - at any cost.
This leaves what's left of global oil exports for the other 140 net importing nations, including many nations with little or no internal oil production at all. What's left for these 140 nations is depicted as what could be termed a "triangle of hope" spanning on the y axis from about 22 to 52 million barrels per day for them today - providing them with about 30 mmbbl per day today, running out to zero available to them in 10 years time. Zero in 10 years time.
And the internal demand of the net exporters crosses the declining global production curve in about 20 years time. At which time there is nothing left to send to any of the importers. At that stage, 20 years out from now, the only oil that will be available to any nation will be the oil it produces itself; with the caveat that IEA predicts that generally all production by then will be down to about 40 per cent on present-day levels.
It appears that there will not be any nation with a surplus of supply over demand. It's my guess that past that date, any global oil movements will be by way of private treaty between parties with something of value to trade rather than within any open market.
Nigwil - New Zealand

RELATED CONTENT

oil field drills
Peak oil is real and will stunt any economic recovery
During the last century, society squandered 500 million years of captured sunlight on drag races, traffic jams, private jets and overheated office buildings - writes Rex Weyler

peak oil graph
Ignoring peak oil and scarcity - political myopia?
 
Peak oil
Peak oil – are we sleepwalking into disaster?